On 29 May 2010, a young mother woke from a sound slumber.
She felt sick. She went and checked on her two young boys Tyler and Chase, aged
six and eight years old respectively. They were deceased. It wasn’t until autopsies
were carried out that it was realised the boys had passed away from carbon monoxide
poisoning. The police’s initial reaction was to blame Vanessa. Her shoulder was
dislocated when she was thrown into the paddy wagon. Tenants who write to me
often say the authorities do not listen to them.
Carbon monoxide is toxic, colourless, odourless, and
tasteless gas. An expert tested the heater and found it was emitting extremely
high amounts of carbon monoxide. A thick layer of built-up soot prevented the
heater from working properly. The heater would have worked properly if it had
been cleaned. It had not been serviced for about ten years. Energy Safe
Victoria recommends that open-flued appliances be checked every two years. All
the details are in the coroner’s findings.
This family had lived in a rental property. The real estate
agency had recommended that there be a regular service of gas and electrical
appliances. The coroner found, as a matter of fact, that the failure of the
landlords to comply was ‘regrettable’ but ‘there was nothing to alert them to any
problem with the appliance’. Magistrate Heffey went on to say that there was
nothing to suggest that they would not have responded appropriately. And
further, any member of the community would not have been aware of the dangers
presented by an unserviced gas service.
The coroner made a number of recommendations. One of her
recommendations was that the consumer booklet – Renting a Home: A Guide for
Landlords and Tenants – be redrafted. Amongst other things, she said:
1. Tenants should be informed as to the safety of gas appliances
2. Tenants should request to have gas appliances checked
1. Tenants should be informed as to the safety of gas appliances
2. Tenants should request to have gas appliances checked
I was overcome by anger
and sorrow as I read the coroner’s recommendations. It was a very conservative
judgment. The sad thing is that the deaths of these two young boys was
entirely preventable. Magistrate Heffey puts the onus on tenants when she
suggests it is their responsibility to ask for evidence that the heater has
been serviced. But why should safety be the tenant’s responsibility? It seems
to me that the coroner is really out of touch with community expectations. It just
doesn’t sound like she has a good understanding of challenges tenants face
during their tenancy.
At a bare minimum, rental houses should be safe and
habitable. Tenants have a right to expect rental homes to be safe. In many
cases, tenants are happy just to have their application approved. In the usual
course of things, tenants are not going to rock the boat by requesting checks
on things like heaters. Nor will they ask for clauses to be inserted into the
rental agreement. Leases are usually presented to tenants on a ‘take it or
leave it basis’. In the United Kingdom, landlords are legally required to
service heaters on rental premises every year. Last year, a UK landlord was
jailed and fined for risking the lives of his tenants.
Magistrate Heffey could have recommended law reform. She
could have recommended the introduction of a general statutory right to safety,
and the implementation of strong enforcement mechanisms. But she did not do that.
And really, it’s quite easy to carry out an investigation of potential hazards.
It’s done all the time in workplace. It goes by the name of occupational health
and safety.
Women and children should expect and demand safety in the
home. It’s not that much to ask. We should be looking after the safety of mums
and the kids in the home. And just so you know, symptoms of carbon monoxide
poisoning include nausea, headache, and fatigue. And be careful – don’t assume
your landlord is thinking about the safety of you and your family. In my next
instalment, I will be looking at what happened to proposed laws about mandatory
servicing and detectors.
And it is so much more disgraceful than that. Vanessa did not only have her shoulder dislocated when she was thrown into the police van, she still has continual pain and life long injuries and yet has to front up at a more than full time career each day to keep herself as she has never received any compensation. If she had of lost her boys in a traffic accident she may at least have been able to afford a deposit for a home of her own or a holiday and some nurturing with compensation, but NOTHING. I am forever angered and disgusted as I know both Scott and Vanessa still struggle terrible with grief and just everyday survival. Will something ever be done for them?
ReplyDelete